Positive and negative consequences of Stolypin’s agrarian reform?

Positive consequences of his reform:

1) Farms are beginning to be created and the production of agricultural products is growing;

2) 30 million virgin lands were mastered, 3 million 40 thousand peasants moved beyond the Urals. Cooperative farms are also being created.

Negative traits:

1) The community was not liquidated. The stratification of the peasants intensified even more;

2) The main problem of land scarcity has not been fully resolved. Also, in the places of resettlement, conflicts often arose with the local population, in connection with which the peasants were forced to return back.